Do duplicates of child attachments receive the same coding through propagation?

When considering the propagation of coding for child attachments in a review management system, it is important to understand how these system functions operate. Child attachments refer to documents that are linked to a primary document, and the propagation process is meant to simplify the management of these related documents.

Duplicates of child attachments do not receive the same coding through propagation because the system treats these duplicates as distinct entities. Each attachment is uniquely identified, and its coding may depend on specific properties or attributes that distinguish it from the original. Given this, the duplicates are effectively isolated from the coding process that applies to their originals.

The rationale for stating that they are not coded through propagation is rooted in ensuring accuracy and consistency in the data management process. Any coding applied might not reflect the original context or relevance of a duplicate, making it vital for users to manually review or code these as needed.

This differentiation allows for better handling of documents in a review setting, where precision is crucial. By treating each duplicate separately, it avoids the potential for confusion or inconsistencies that could arise if all duplicates were automatically coded similarly to their originals.