If two reviewers edit a markup simultaneously, what occurs?

When two reviewers edit a markup simultaneously, one of the primary concerns is how these edits are managed and whether they can coexist without conflict. In this scenario, if both reviewers are making changes at the same time, the system may not be capable of resolving these concurrent changes automatically, leading to complications.

Typically, in systems that do not support real-time collaboration, having two users attempt to edit the same markup can result in an error. This could manifest as one set of changes being rejected, or it may prompt one user that their changes cannot be saved due to conflicting edits. Such a situation necessitates manual intervention where one reviewer must submit their changes before the other can proceed.

This highlights the importance of understanding system capabilities and ensuring that workflows are designed to handle simultaneous edits properly. In scenarios where collaboration tools are not employed, conflicts stemming from concurrent edits can lead to data inconsistency and loss of information.